Talk:Post-Britpop/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online sources are live links

   The article is adequately referenced.

   Sources all appear to be reliable

   All sources support the cited statements

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As broad as is possible for such a young genre.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   It appears fair and un-biassed

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable, no edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used, with correct licensing and a caption. Might be nice to see more pictures, but not a GA requirement

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   A good short article, and it meets all the GA criteria, so I am happy to list this. When we move onto the next genre, it may be possible to add a more retrospective look at the subject but for the moment it is fine. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)