Talk:Portrait of Toulouse Lautrec, in Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, with the Natansons/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 18:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Excellent work creating and consistently improving this article. Your efforts have shown through by how digestible something this specific can be! I have an ask in the Lead Section, and two pieces of feedback in the Reference section. Looking forward to hearing from you about your thoughts in the below areas.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Tight lead section. Is there something more direct to state about the significance of this work as it is explored throughout the article?
- Yes, the lead needs to be expanded. I don't know why I didn't do this. I will expand it by tonight.
- I took a crack at it. Viriditas (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the lead needs to be expanded. I don't know why I didn't do this. I will expand it by tonight.
- Tight lead section. Is there something more direct to state about the significance of this work as it is explored throughout the article?
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- High quality reference, but even more impressive has been the excellent copy editing and tone throughout the article which pulls from the resources.
- a (reference section):
- Many of the references require registration to access the contents. Would you convert them to {{cite web ... }} so that it may be indicated? Reference 2 "Cogeval, Guy", 3: "Warnod, Jeanine", 6: "Russell, John", 7: "Naudin, Jean-Bernard", 8: "Mack, Gerstle", 9: "Frey, Julia", 10: "Sugana, G.M.", 11: "Leaf, Alexandra", 14: "Wright, Christopher".
- I don't use citation templates, but I did add {{registration required}} to all of the relevant links. Let me know if that's okay. Viriditas (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Reference 12 "O'Connor, Patrick" seems to be available here.
- Done. Good catch. Viriditas (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Clearly about the artwork and expands to help the reader understand the significance of this style, setting, and subject.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Inspiration as well as other pieces by this artist during this time help add context for readers.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall: Thank you for your efforts to address my concerns!
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.