Talk:Portrait of Madame Cézanne (Lichtenstein)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 05:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Lead it too short. Needs to be expanded.
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- "The drawings fascinated Lichtenstein, if for no other reason than the attraction of outlining a Cézanne when the artist himself had noted that the outline escaped him. To make a diagram by isolating the woman out of the context of the painting seemed to Lichtenstein to be such an oversimplification of a complex issue as to be ironical in itself."[5] This was a statement on Loran's oversimplifying paradox of representing Cézanne's work with nothing more than black lines. --> You can't just have a quote and then state who said it in a another sentence.
- These are two different sources. I have added the editor of the first, which is an exact quotation, to the text.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Detail --> Description
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- No further issues.
- Great. All issues resolved. Passing the article! Statυs (talk) 16:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.