Talk:Population ecology
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that an ecological diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Population ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051104081736/http://www.uoguelph.ca:80/zoology/courses/BIOL3130/wells11.pdf to http://www.uoguelph.ca/zoology/courses/BIOL3130/wells11.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Population dynamics
[edit]As I have always understood it, 'population dynamics' is the maths modelling population changes, and 'population ecology' is applying it to the field. As such, 90% of the text of this article is about 'population dynamics', only small bits (terminology, r/K selection, population viability analysis, metapopulation, journals) are about ecology, everything else belongs in that article. The picture about mathematical epidemiology has almost nothing to do with ecology. Then the article about 'population dynamics' has bits which belong here (fisheries and wildlife management, control applications). I'm actually not specifically recommending merging these articles, instead switching large portions; that or merge this article to 'pop. dynamics', as that was what the subject was called when I studied it at uni. Leo Breman (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely certain what you're proposing here. And granted, both articles are pretty bad, and overlap in all sorts of ways they shouldn't.
- Population ecology is the broader concept, and this should be written in summary style tying together a collection of daughter articles. Population dynamics is both one of those daughter topics and the parent of many of them. Guettarda (talk) 21:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Well, for one, more discussion, so this is a start, haha. "Population ecology is the broader concept", not necessarily: the mathematical formulae in 'population dynamics' can also be used outside of ecology.
- My personal preference is would be to move all the formulae to the 'population dynamics' article, leaving these subjects/sections in this one: terminology, r/K selection, population viability analysis, metapopulation, journals; then move the subjects/sections: fisheries and wildlife management, control applications from 'population dynamics' here. Leo Breman (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, it's been a week. I'm just going to be bold and do as I suggested. Leo Breman (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done here, it'd be nice if someone added the picture requested above, and maybe some case studies from Odum or biology textbooks... All these ecology articles seem to be collecting the same off-topic stuff complaining about humans ad nauseam. This article went from reasonable in 2013 to shitty over the past 7 years. People, there are other articles about environmentalism, please let the ecology articles inform readers about the topic at hand, instead of soapboxing extremist bourgeoisie politics. Leo Breman (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Kk
[edit]K 157.46.102.211 (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Ecology
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kboss99 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sorkhabi1234 (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Biology 2
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2024 and 3 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbigs123, MB98240 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Cbigs123 (talk) 16:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)