Talk:Popular Mobilization Forces

Some stupid Taliban from Afghanistan have totally bankrupted and manipulated the informations on this side. It's not anymore a source for knowledge and information, but for a propaganda war. Fyi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.57.33.83 (talk) 06:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Popular Mobilization Forces article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Iraq Mid‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Arab world Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Size

The source must be provided. The source stating the size in the template box states a determined number, which is not 2 milions soldiers but up to 90,000. If someone has another source, he/she must provide it alongside his/her correction. --Mach1988 (talk) 12:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Monday 10, 2017"

It's not a correct date. The month is missing. Ahyangyi (talk) 06:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Popular Mobilization Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

A group of PMF tanks.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

French and Arabic Article Links

Can we get translations for the FR and AR Articles?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Mesa (talk • contribs) 01:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation for Union Of Popular Forces

Is it the political party from Morocco (cite 71)?
                                        Mr. Mesa (talk) 01:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Mr.Mesa[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Flag of the Kurdish White Flags.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of the Wagner Group (variant).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of paying allegiance to Iran

Keep the following in mind when making any claim of PMF groups paying allegiance to Iran:

1. In light of the seriousness of the allegation, I would venture to claim that one would need official confirmation. Provide proper proof of official statements of the group or said group’s leaders wherein they openly admit to paying political allegiance to another state. Proof of the fact that Iran had a role in creating or supporting these groups, or that they have converging interests/ideologies is not sufficient; states around the world including U.S have created as well as support formal armed groups as well as informal groups, militias etc. would it be fair to claim that they pay allegiance to U.S simply because they were created by the U.S or receive support from it or they agree with each other ideologically?

2. Distinguish between political allegiance and Taqlid (jurisprudential emulation). Taqlid of individual people in any of these groups to Khamenei or any other Iranian or non-Iranian Mujtahid (even if it were true) does not equate to the whole group paying political allegiance to another state. (This has been suggested by some political commentators).

3. Obviously pay heed to the overall reliability and neutrality of the source provided. Montblamc1 (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]