Talk:Popov (vodka)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on May 21, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

I'm confused. The article seems like a promo piece. It states that Popov is owned by Diageo, yet the article (3) mentioned talks about Smirnoff, also owned by Diageo, is mentioned as a competitor.

The data used to establish Popov as a "popular" brand is based on 3+ year old info.

This article should be deleted...

What the heck?

"Popov also can come in glass bottles, which was the common purchased material of Brandon Volas in 2005, contributing to the demise of his baseball career."

Where exactly did that information come from?

That guy is a freaking moron!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.43.244.202 (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"elegant plastic jug"

Haha...you funny. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saint Invective (talk • contribs) 19:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 competing product by the same company is called flanking

they tend to compete with other competitors in their respective segments.

used by who?

I fail to understand the statement "used by personal injury lawyers." Lawyers make bank, drink fine liquor and do cocaine, they do not, however, drink British piss out of a bottle. I think this part should be deleted, leaving the college students part of the statement intact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.128.27 (talk) 02:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Popov (vodka). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061022103411/http://cio-asia.com/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=387&pubid=5&issueid=35 to http://www.cio-asia.com/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=387&pubid=5&issueid=35

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]