Talk:Pop princess
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 July 2007. The result of the discussion was redirect to Pop icon. |
Don't delete a singer from a category. Don't delete artists because you don't like them. Keep singers there or add people. DO NOT Delete them! —This unsigned comment was added by 24.233.84.42 (talk • contribs) .
Origins
[edit]From my own research, the idea of the pop princess probably got started in the early 1960's with the way Mercury Records promoted Lesley Gore, particularly the one-two punch of the singles "It's My Party" and "Judy's Turn to Cry." That became precedent for other record companies: MCA's marketing of Tiffany; Atlantic's of Stacey Q, Deborah Gibson and Jewel; Zomba's of Britney Spears; Sony BMG's of Christina Aguilera; and particularly Disneyland's of Miley Cyrus, Ashley Tisdale, &c. Probably other labels are doing likewise. - B.C.Schmerker 04:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Bangles
[edit]I have a real problem with The Bangles, who were an actual rock band - as opposed to being the creation of a record producer/impresario or already famous for acting or modeling, categories that describe the other women on this list - and who had considerable credibility , were part of the Paisley Underground scene, and even played on a bill with Black Flag, being included on this list. —This unsigned comment was added by 4.231.179.79 (talk • contribs) .
- I agree. I've removed them, as well as the CategorisationDisputedPeople tag. AvB ÷ talk 13:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Paris Hilton
[edit]Paris Hilton should not be classified as a pop princess. Sure she attempted to become one with her music "career", but one bubblegum pop hit sung by a moderatively pretty girl does not a pop princess make!!! 58.160.183.52 09:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Please clean up this article
[edit]This article has been marked as unsourced for nearly a year now. It is full of original research and weasel words. believe that it also has biography of living people policy issues. Unless it is properly sourced very quickly, I will reduce it to a one line stub. It is very important that articles such as this be properly sourced. Please take this warning seriously and fix the article. Thanks, Gwernol 11:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- After five days, not a single source has been added and the serious problems of original research and weasel words remained, so I have reduced the article to a stub. Please only add material back to the article if you can cite a reliable source for the information. Thanks, Gwernol 04:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Most of this article cannot be sourced though. Most of the information has been lost, is hard-to-find, or are first-hand accounts. Therefore, I don't think that it is fair for the article to be reduced to a single stub. I am going to add the list of pop princesses back to the article (without the pictures) Haseo9999 04:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please read WP:V which is one of Wikiepdia's core content policies. If information cannot be sourced it cannot be added to a Wikipedia article. Sorry, Gwernol 13:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Most of this article cannot be sourced though. Most of the information has been lost, is hard-to-find, or are first-hand accounts. Therefore, I don't think that it is fair for the article to be reduced to a single stub. I am going to add the list of pop princesses back to the article (without the pictures) Haseo9999 04:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)