This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
The main thing wrong with the article is the accuracy, but the errors look like transcription errors. It certainly could and should be made accurate, but if you are going to go to the trouble, it could use some augmentation and formatting. I think anyone willing to check the sources and do the work should just jump in, as the article is easily fixed.Dave23:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't the Polack drawing be more accurately representative of the ancient river port / dock Portus Tiberinus'? Its position in the drawing is pretty much exactly where and what it would have looked like? The Pons Sublicius is generally acknowledged as being further downstream, roughly equivalent with the current Via del Porto. --Moree.101 (talk) 03:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
