Talk:Ponosov's case

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Science & education / History / Politics and law Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Current Event?

There seems to be a relatively minor dispute on whether this page documents a current event. The Current Event tag has been removed twice, but the article suggests that the case was remanded to the lower court. If that's true, then there are likely still developments that will occur in this case and the Current Event tag seems appropriate. I think that the current event tag should probably stay on the article.Dekkanar 20:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention

Some people are insisting that the Category:Microsoft criticisms and controversies be added. Note the description of the category: "Articles relating to controversies and criticisms of Microsoft's business practices and software." ... how does this article, in any way, match up with that? The action was taken by the Russian government, on their own, without prompting or co-operation from Microsoft. Have a look at the other articles in that category... they involve significant criticisms of Microsoft, as well as legal cases in which they were actively involved. -/- Warren 00:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbachev's Letter to Gates

It reads very tongue-in-cheek. "Imprisonment in Siberian camps..." this is playing on Westerners' stereotypes of what Siberia is. Every time I read it it sounds just sarcastic, as if Gorbachev (who sold his own country) is trying to make the defendant, and the rest of the population by proxy, seem downtrodden and pathetic. (And what kind of serious personal letter is presented in a newspaper, anyway?)

Aside from being a silly publicity thing, this letter didn't have any effect on the affair. If nobody presents a serious objection to this, I'll remove it. 70.59.150.74 (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 19 the Perm krai court overturned earlier decisions and pledged Ponosov not guilty

http://www.interfax-russia.ru/r/B/povoljie/318.html?menu=4&id_issue=12201845

--79.111.108.94 (talk) 03:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ponosov's case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/05/07/russia.microsoft.reut/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070210073057/http://www.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2007/02/01/1309_type82915type82917_117609.shtml to http://www.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2007/02/01/1309_type82915type82917_117609.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070321192146/http://alex-ponosov.livejournal.com/ to http://alex-ponosov.livejournal.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ponosov's case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071230182542/http://eng.cnews.ru/news/top/indexEn.shtml?2007%2F02%2F12%2F235414 to http://eng.cnews.ru/news/top/indexEn.shtml?2007%2F02%2F12%2F235414

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]