Talk:Polysilicon depletion effect
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Assessment
[edit]This had been assessed as "B class" by the article's creator on the basis that references had been added. I have downgraded this to "C" class on the following basis.
- It does not comply with the Manual of Style format for articles or encyclopedic style (multiple uses of the first person "we", "so", etc. It is written and structured like a student essay rather than an encyclopedia article. It should not have a "Conclusion"
- The subject of the article is mentioned nowhere in the lead, nor is a simple definition ever provided for what the polysilicon depletion effect actually is.
- The article is is very short (500 words) and severely limited in in its scope, considering the large amount of literature on this subject. It does not provide the general reader with anything approaching a clear and reasonably complete understanding of what this effect is, how it comes about, what type of research has been done in the area, etc. Rather, it launches into a discussion of the problems of "doped Polysilicon gate" as a solution to the problem of polysilicon depletion and why it should be replaced by a metal gate.
I strongly suggest a proper assessment by WikiProject Electronics. ––Voceditenore (talk) 11:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Osiris (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the copyright problem Osiris.I have re-written the whole paragraph, I found no further copyvio issues. Thank you. Deepon (talk) 15:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)