Talk:Polydor Records

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Record Labels High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge with greater history

Note that Jan. 27, 2006, content was merged in from the article Polydor, which is now a redirect. The Polydor article has the greater page history. I might have suggested doing it the other way around and renaming, to preserve more page history, but that would have taken admin assistance. It'll all work out in the end, but this note can direct editors interested in the article history. Hu 21:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs rewriting, really

This article ought to be rewritten by somebody with a thorough grasp of the subject. The first paragraph is opaque to the point of incomprehensibility and the subsequent text is very thin. The tone is all wrong, too; just what is "forcing PolyGram to gut most of its staff" supposed to mean? BTLizard 14:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a disaster, although the pictures are quite interesting. What about the 1960s with Hendrix, The Who, etc. There is no information about the A&R team at Polydor UK in the 1970s and signings such as The Jam, Siouxsie and the Banshees, etc. This label was at the forefront of signing new wave bands. No mention of Slade, New Seekers, etc. Talking about Coast to Coast on Polydor in the 80s is just madness...they were a one hit wonder on Polydor and not worth a mention. You should be mentioning Level 42, Style Council and The Wonderstuff etc...Furthermore, what about current roster with Gewen Stefani and the rest?. The article needs beefing up properly, it talks as if Polydor is on it's last legs. Little is made of James Last either, who was a massive seller on his label....

This article was obviously written with Polydor US in mind, which shut down operations nearly ten years ago, after years of becoming more and more dormant. Toward the bottom of the article, there is notation of Polydor UK still being a thriving major label. Also, Gwen Stefani is an American-based act, signed to the the American-based Interscope Records. Her records are simply distributed by Polydor abroad (as are all Interscope acts) but she isn't directly signed to Polydor. Anyway, instead of folks complaining about the way the article looks, why not simply edit it yourself? Just make sure when (and if) you do that you don't negate what's already there. —The Real One Returns 00:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"No Frenchman, though, could be expected to buy (or pronounce!) a product labelled Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft" Anyone, please? --HAdG (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

++

Accuracy dispute

According to the packaging of a number of 2000-present re-releases, Universal Records rather than A&M Records handles U.S. re-releases of the Polydor back catalog... Ranma9617 02:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Polydor

Hello. For the record (haha), I know that Polydor redirects to Polydor Records, which is not what the company is named currently. The official name is now Polydor Ltd. Because it is both a record label and a company, does anyone think that maybe the page should be moved, with permission from an administrator, to Polydor? Please reply ASAYC. sa (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is still above all a record label. To give an example, Atlantic Records is officially called Atlantic Recording Corporation. But its Wikipedia article is still called Atlantic Records. For the same reason, this article should still be called Polydor Records. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

++

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Polydor Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66AJXyNiq?url=http://www.dg-111.com/en_GB/history to http://www.dg-111.com/en_GB/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polydor Communications

Polydor Communications was a motion picture production company founded in 1979 by Ted Field. Its divisions included Polydor Records. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.205.135.108 (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contradicts another Entry

The entry The Beatles with Tony Sheridan and Their Guests says the Beatles were called the Beatles when they recorded the songs for Bonny by Tony Sheridan and the Beat Brothers, but Polydor substituted The Beat Brothers because Beatles sounded like "peedles" which is Hamburg slang for penises. There's no citation, but it's the story I've always heard. This article says they were known at the time as The Beat Brothers and later changed their name to The Beatles. Jackisediting (talk) 06:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]