Talk:Pollyanna principle

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Year of introduction

http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100335215 <- This states that the term was coined in 1964, and in fact this paper mentions pollyanna and says "(e.g., a general “pollyanna” tendency we have noted consistently in our earlier work)", which probably means he used this concept even before then. --Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 15:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Positivity effect into Pollyanna principle or Negativity bias

Positivity effect has a many issues. Both principle and effect articles describe psychological tendencies where individuals favor positive information over negative. The positivity effect focuses on the ability, especially in older adults, to remember and pay attention to positive information more than negative. Similarly, the Pollyanna principle highlights the human inclination to recall pleasant items more accurately than unpleasant ones. This conceptual overlap suggests that merging the pages could provide a more comprehensive understanding overall of the positive bias in human cognition, combining would create a unified framework showing how it manifests in different contexts, such as aging and emotional regulation, while the Pollyanna principle is rooted in general cognitive processes and memory. It enhances clarity for readers by reducing redundancy, consolidating information. Both concepts are often used interchangeably in psychological literature. By merging the pages, we can ensure consistency in terminology and avoid confusion. This would help in standardizing the language used to describe these phenomena, making it easier for readers to follow and understand the content. LIrala (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]