Talk:Polling for United States presidential elections

A fact from Polling for United States presidential elections appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that U.S. President Harry Truman won an upset victory in 1948 after trailing in the polls by a significant margin throughout nearly all of 1948?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/September.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as High-importance).

2012 section

Surely there must be enough for a 2012 section? Giant Snowman 11:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source of poll numbers

What is the source of the poll numbers on this page? Kaltenmeyer (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about 2012, since I am not the one who posted [b]those[/b] numbers here, but here is the source for the poll numbers for 1936 to 2008: http://www.gallup.com/poll/110548/gallup-presidential-election-trialheat-trends-19362004.aspx#4 Futurist110 (talk) 23:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historical polling for United States presidential elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120202114146/http://www.kennesaw.edu/pols/3380/pres/1964.html to http://www.kennesaw.edu/pols/3380/pres/1964.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Historical polling for United States presidential elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gallup-centric

What is the point of an article that is centered upon only one polling source??? Seems it would be more logical to split each election cycle into their own article, and include all available polls from every reputable polling source.SecretName101 (talk) 03:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV/Irrelevant Information

Hello everybody,

In the sections regarding the 2000 and 2016 presidential elections, there is text that refers to the popular vote as 'meaningless'. Additionally, in the 2000 section the article states that 'most people don't know' how the electoral college works. At the very least, that is a citation needed. I think the article would be fine without all of those statements. - Xenologer48 (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that it looks like that information was added in a series of edits made April 24, 2020, so this is a new addition to the page

The person who made the change also seems to have a history of making similar politically charged edits such as these ones (which were reverted) https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kirstjen_Nielsen&diff=prev&oldid=867642099 https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Jennifer_Rubin_(journalist)&diff=prev&oldid=848684025

I also would agree with removing them personally

--Melvni (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have done it, though I forgot to sign in because I haven't done this before. Le sigh. Xenologer48 (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete

User:GamerKiller2347, you recently proposed deleting this article because it lacks some sources. Shouldn't we just add the sources? Xenologer48 (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xenologer48, if we can find them, yes. GamerKiller2347 (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]