Talk:Pollentia

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Location

The Catholic Encyclopedia and a Dartmouth webpage have this city on an island. However, the 2004 EB version gives the same location has the 1911 version on which this article is based. There is a city named Pollenca/Pollensa on the island, perhaps it is a mixup. -- Kjkolb 08:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there do seem to be (at least) two towns which the Romans called Pollentia: the one covered by this article, where the battle was fought, and another on the island of Mallorca now known as Alcúdia (that article doesn’t mention the fact, but the one in Spanish does [[1]], as does the English Mallorca). Ian Spackman 03:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All Those Juicy Remains

I am a bit puzzled by the refs to amphitheatres, temples, etc. The Blue Guide to Northern Italy fails to mention them, as does the Italian wikipedia article Pollentia and the Italian wikipedia article Bra (not a disambiguation page in Italian). The page on Pollentia at the official Bra site [2] seems to say that although there were indeed temples, aquaducts, etc., all you can see today—and preferably from the air—is the shape of the amphitheatre as outlined by more recent buildings. I have made the article a bit vague on this. Ian Spackman 03:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]