Talk:Politics of Edinburgh

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edinburgh Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Should MSPs include the Lothian list MSPs, as they cover Edinburgh as well?

Councillors

I've added the title Councillor to all of the names of the councillors for Edinburgh here as the links which were in place were all to other people of the same name. --Brideshead 18:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article focus

I am not clear as to what the article is supposed to be about
The Edinburgh council area, which is also a city?
The City of Edinburgh Council?
Or the politics of the City Edinburgh council area (hence the info about constituencies)?
I get the feeling most of the content would be better positioned at "Politics of the City of Edinburgh council area", referenced as a "main article" in "Edinburgh"
Laurel Bush 10:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment at Talk:Edinburgh#Article focus. This article is at the correct title, and should be about the present day council area called 'City of Edinburgh' (and its council and possibly constituencies), which is not a city, and is not the same thing as Edinburgh. ::Supergolden:: 12:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what is Edinburgh? A city? If so, what sort of city? I believe its now the council area (or its representive council) which now holds the [[City status in the United Kingdom|city]] title. Perhaps by ""city"" it is [[city]] Supergolden means. Laurel Bush 14:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

That is exactly what I meant. Edinburgh is a city. City of Edinburgh is a council area. ::Supergolden:: 10:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Council area and city are one and the same thing! It is a council area because the City of Edinburgh Council represents the city, and the existence of the representative body helps to define the area as a city, in the sense of having "city status in the United Kingdom". As the title of an article. "City of Edinburgh" does not define the artcle as having focus different from "Edinburgh". "City of Edinburgh Council", or "Politics of the City of Ediburgh council area" would make a very important difference. Please see also discussion under "Talk:Aberdeen#Merge in content from Aberdeen City?". Laurel Bush 11:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Move article?
The article is not about the City of Edinburgh
It is about the City of Edinburgh Council, and the politics of the council area more generally
"City of Edinburgh" should become a redirect to "Edinburgh"
Laurel Bush 10:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't assume silence means agreement, but I am thinking it is about time I took some action. Laurel Bush 13:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

MSP list

Should MSPs include the Lothian list MSPs, as they cover Edinburgh as well?

The article does list 'additional members' elected from the region. Perhaps it should say something about party representation for the region as a whole (taking accout of constituency MSPs elected from outside Edinburgh). Laurel Bush 17:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Constituencies since 1708

Edinburgh North (UK Parliament constituency) has been completely left out. Yes, it did exist before being merged into Edinburgh North & Leith. --John Muir 11:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Edinburghlogo.png

Image:Edinburghlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Politics of Edinburgh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion

I propose that The City of Edinburgh Council be merged into Politics of Edinburgh. The article name to be used is open to debate, personally I am more familiar with the West Coast convention which use Glasgow City Council with Politics of Glasgow as a redirect; however, I see that the article covering Dundee is Politics of Dundee with Dundee City Council as a redirect. Aberdeen currently also has both a Politics article and a City Council article, which again seems unnecessary and I will be making the same suggestion on those pages.

Much of the content in the two articles (neither of which is particularly large) is repeated, or relates to matters which could be covered under the same article. Some of the content of the Politics article refers to national events such as the 2014 Referendum, but it correctly focuses to Edinburgh voting patterns so its inclusion would be justified in an article mainly on the local authority.

I will mention this suggestion on WP:SCOTLAND for further input. Crowsus (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Support' this article's coverage is about history and pollical make-up, all easily fits under the City Council's article. Similar to what I broadened the Southampton City Council article. Jonjonjohny (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by proposer: thanks for the above comment. However, having considered this, I am now of the opinion that the presence of two articles is valid, and wish to withdraw the proposal; I will instead look to make/seek improvements to the Glasgow article with a view to splitting it similarly into historical and current articles; with sufficient content it would be justified as exists for the other cities, but I would say that the content is not at the required standard and breadth to separate at present. Crowsus (talk) 19:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - one is a generic topic, the other about a specific entity. 77.183.12.176 (talk) 22:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]