This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
You've done it again, Gvssy. This is a great article! I did some copy editing (please, go through it if you have the time and revert anything I might've gotten wrong), and added a few "[Citation needed]" (where the paragraph's end was missing a citation) and "[clarification needed]" (on instances where the strength is reported as "X men/soldiers and X cavalry" - are these "men/soldiers" supposed to be infantry?). I would appreciate it if you could clarify here. I've also removed some instances where I thought the citations were unnecessary repetitions. If I'm allowed to come with a suggestion, it would be to move the vast majority of information on the Bornholm incident to its main article, which is in a rather poor state at the moment. But you do as you wish here. Thanks for the article! Imonoz (talk) 23:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, yes I will clarify alot of the information in the article and I will of course move the text of the bornholm incident from it to the main article. But again, thank you! Gvssy (talk) 06:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources that go in-depth about this war have already been cited, so I recommend reading them if you are more interested in the war. As for what you said, I wouldn't consider the article "short" as it has over 30,00 bytes of text in it, which shouldn't be considered short. Gvssy (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
