Talk:Polikarpov I-3/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Putting this on hold for a short while. As you only need to fix a few things.
- Pass/Fail: Putting this on hold for a short while. As you only need to fix a few things.
Comments
[edit]1. aircraft completed with the. Suggest - aircraft were completed with the
- Good catch.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)