Jump to content

Talk:Polaroid Eyewear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copy edit

[edit]

While performing the overdue copy-edit, I deleted a fair amount of overly promotional text and links. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Others?

[edit]

Are there manufacturers other than Polaroid who manufacture polarized lenses? How long does the patent last>1archie99 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Polaroid Eyewear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely poor article

[edit]

This wiki article is very poor. It appears to be authored by a borderline illiterate person. The use of present case for historical events in the history section is unacceptable for pre-teen children's writing much less an encyclopedia. There are NO CITATIONS to support what may be an assertion that Polaroid moved production to Scotland. THEY DIDN'T. Polaroid was an international corporation that had a presence in many areas but "Little Britain" raises its ugly head AGAIN here at Wikipedia in order to use apparent illiteracy in expression to create a false impression that somehow Polaroid had become a British entity. This nonsense is wrecking Wikipedia. At least at one time the required citations could be referenced to tease the facts out of the mistakes in an article. But this article continues the trend of complete and total fabrication by British schoolboys with citations that don't support the bizarre sophomoric assertions strewn about to create a sense of a proper article. But actual examination motivated by a lack of ignorance shows that THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS COMPLETE FABRICATION. Wake up Wales. Wikipedia is faltering.2600:1700:6D90:79B0:2C6F:5CEA:9B1:40F7 (talk) 03:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]