Talk:Polaris Project/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 04:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References need to be formatted to indicate at least the publisher or author of the work.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used File:Polaris Project Logo.png with valid fair use rationale.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Comments:I am quick-failing this article based on copy-right violations. [1] [2] It appears much of this article was copy and pasted from elsewhere in Spring 2010 and gone undetected since then. Before re-nominating the article, account for where all the information has come from with references/citations and remove the {{refimprove}} tags. —maclean (talk) 04:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)