Talk:Points of View (TV programme)

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

discretely -> discreetly

Is this jut a spelling error or typo?

"Discrete" means "separate" (grossly simple definition). "Discreet" means "subtle".

Perhaps discretely is intended but there is no discrete section of the prog or anything is there?

Possibly easiest just to cut the word entirely. SimonTrew (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would help the hard of thinking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.171.253 (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

The article is a bit too jokey and informal and it doesn't seem to have any references at all. Paul S (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Length of run

Given the uncontroversial statement that it was dropped for eight years, would it not be more sensible for the sidebar to say "1961-71, 1979-present"? Harfarhs (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]