Talk:Po

Untitled

It’s nice to know knowledge about P.O

Untitled

po should link here and not the Po river, right? Can someone fix that redirect who is more experienced with wikipedia? I can do it but I'm not sure if I should or not. Tkjazzer 14:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the link to the disambig page on po river is adequate. Tkjazzer (talk) 04:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

The disambig page with two parenthesis -{disambiguation)) - is an error and should be merged to here. Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2890 at the 50 ‘s is gone but who made numbers today[reply]

What is the story, people?

I originally expanded the page to include many more Po's of different cultures. Since then there has been what I can only consider a running battle between persons of no user page and very short duration on Wikipedia and legitimate rv persons over whether big chunks of the page should be plucked out. I admit I tend to be too enthusiastic about these disambig pages, but what is this? The page has lost much of its content and has become disorganized. Why are the acronyms mixed in with the rest? The reverters put up a noble fight but the others just kept at it and at it. This would NEVER be allowed in an article.

Since no reasons are given for ANY deletions, I'm within my license to just revert the whole thing to what I had when I left it. I did notice an opinion that the page should be cleaned up. Here are my objections:

Mass deletions are allowed by new users of short duration with no user pages.
Mass deletions are allowed without reasons given.
The deletions appear to have no logical scheme.
This is a concerted attack on this page. The other disambig pages don;t seem to get it.

How can we allow this? It wouldn't be allowed in an article. I want to be reasonable. How about some explanations right now right here on this discussion page, for a starter. How about someone volunteering to decide what should go in and what not, stating who you are and what your plan is. I don't ask you for a biographical user page, only that you STOP striking out of the dark and start explaining yourself. Otherwise, I tell you what I am going to do, I am going to revert the whole page to the way I had it! I notice a few additions I didn't think of are there.

I notice that all the Chinese Po's are gone! Why is that? Explanation, please. The names also have been decimated. Let's go, let's go, I don't wish to be uncivil, but that is what YOU are being. Let's have it. Why are you mysterious, why are you anti-Chinese? What's going on here?Dave (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK propaniac, I saw you. I saw your other comment as well. I see you mainly work on disambig pages. I might not do it that way but then I'm not primarily working on disambig pages. Forget it then, it isn't too bad. I'm going away away now, assuming you have control of it, and wont be back. See you around possibly; if not, so long.Dave (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]