Talk:Plymouth Belvedere

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Clarify?

The engine displacements for virtually all years are a total disaster - virtually all incorrect. When I find time, I'll try to fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehrenberg (talk • contribs) 03:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify?

The article says, "was slightly better than a quarter of Chevrolet Bel Air and Ford Victoria production for that same period." I'm guessing it means either one, not both combined. Can somebody who knows clarify? Lee Iacocca 09:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa's Belvedere

I think the Tulsa's belvedere should branch off in to it's own separate article/stub.

Things to discuss would be:

Why the Belvedere model was chosen
The history of the burial event
Urban Legends that may have arisen over the decades
The unearthing of the Belvedere
The people involved in the original planning and burial.
The items buried in side of the time capsule with the car.

--70.126.236.103 01:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the same thing. How about, Who won? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.94.145 (talk) 23:42, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

So did I. I was watching this story with great interest and I was deeply saddended that tha car was ruined. I've gone and forked off a new article at Miss Belvedere. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed motors from the 61-63 line, will update later today with correct motors, I know for a fact the 225 and 383 came in it as I have owned both but the 340 and 327 are quaetionable and the 318 in it woyuld be the "poly 318" as the LA 318 came out in 1967

Tim —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.76.48.42 (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

426ci?

Why the hell does the section on the '62-64 Belvedere explain how the car was "used to introduce the 426ci engine", and how it was "highly desirable with this engine as a drag car due to it's lightweight body", and how "it dominated NASCAR's Daytona with the 426ci engine" (to paraphrase), while the info box only includes the 225ci Slant-six and the 383ci V8? Seems contradictory..45Colt 00:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130205133617/http://tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070623_238_A1_spanc67588 to http://tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070623_238_A1_spanc67588

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not billed as 58 but 57

If you look at Chrstine movie start, you will find that the movie says 1957, not 1958.

Engines: Second Generation

Chrysler never made ANY of the V8 engines in the sidebar.

Chrysler made a 241.3 cubic inch V8 (not a 341.3, and it was known as the 241, but not an I6 of that size.)

ALL of the V8 engine displacements are wrong, I don't know of anyone that made them except the 429 (Ford), 352 (Ford FE), and Ford also made a 462 (MEL) and a 370 (385-series related to the 426/460). No one I'm aware of made a 461, 451, 384, or 371.

https://www.allpar.com/mopar/list.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faktbuff (talk • contribs) 01:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]