Talk:Pluripotency

Untitled

I think this stub should be merged with four closely related stubs into a new page titled "Cell Potency". —Preceding unsigned comment added by RAC e CA12 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comment. Perhaps Stem Cell Potency might be a slightly clearer title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.91.155 (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of pluripotency given is too narrow with more recent findings such as induced pluripotent stem cells from adult tissue. I think the definition needs to be reworked and more recent research beyond embryonic tissue should be included.Jcody10 (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pluripotency/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Changed rating to "high" as this is an important concept in cell biology/development. - tameeria 22:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)