Talk:Player's Option: Combat & Tactics

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

2.5 edition?

By the way, if anyone could find a source that explains how Player's Option works with the development of the game, that would be supa-cool. Looking over this book again, with past in persective, it's like the combat system was halfway in-between 2E and 3E - so many similarities to both! BOZ (talk) 04:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alot of people have referred to the Player's Option books as a "2.5 Edition," but they were never officially referred to as such to the best of my knowledge. Nutiketaiel (talk) 14:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like most of this article is just a series of direct quotes from a single source. Any way this can be improved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.59.12.226 (talk) 03:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could trim the reception section a bit. 2601:D:B480:ED2:498B:DCCA:A58F:298C (talk) 12:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]