Talk:Playboy/Archives/2014
This is an archive of past discussions about Playboy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Edit request from Burtinsh, 8 October 2010
Latvia have PlayBoy too. From this year. http://www.mango.lv/zinas/apraksti/personibas/pirma-playboy-meitene--anna-rozite.m?id=34525173&serialized_data=a:8:{s:2:%22fa%22;a:1:{i:0;s:5:%2263576%22;}s:1:%22s%22;s:6:%22style7%22;s:1:%22r%22;b:0;s:1:%22l%22;i:8;s:2:%22si%22;b:1;s:4:%22hash%22;i:0;s:9:%22activeimg%22;i:7;s:4:%22burl%22;s:27:%22http://foto.delfi.lv/js/ec/%22;}
Burtinsh (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done Added with a somewhat more reliable source being used for it. Tabercil (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- And delisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:34, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Edit request on 22 February 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The list of countries in which Playboy publishes is incomplete. Playboy Moldova launched online in October 2011. www.playboymoldova.com and www.playmate.md The first hard copy edition of the magazine is scheduled for launch Spring 2012.
For further confirmation this third party article verifies: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hugh-hefner-playboy-interview-238754
92.81.35.99 (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Done Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Edit Request / New Litigation Link
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The litigation section could definitely use a link to the actual court case http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Playboy_Enterprises,_Inc._v._Netscape_Communications_Corp. especially because the link in the citation is dead. It took me 20 minutes to find the referenced case.
Replace the words "On the January blah, blah," with "On the January blah, blah during the court case Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp.,". 76.123.93.232 (talk) 10:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Link added with these edits. Thank you. (Note: I didn't tag the CNET reference link as dead, because it worked for me when I tested it.) Begoon talk 12:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Links
New business
[1](Lihaas (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)).
Party Jokes Editor
Today's New York Times (Tuesday, February 25, 2014) contains an obituary of Comedian Harold Ramis, and it mentions that he was an editor of Playboy's Party Jokes and rose to become associative editor. Playboy should be proud to have recognized early the talent of the master comedian who went on to write the script for Ghostbusters and many other insanely funny movies. This could be inserted right after the Famous Contributors section, or maybe even in that section. Someone has already added it the the Wikipedia article on Harold Ramis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.57.32 (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Playboy logo
Playboys iconic logo seems to be absent from the page.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- True. Though it is at Playboy Enterprises. Dismas|(talk) 20:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I saw no reason for this, so I updated the logo. The new logo includes both the iconic logo and the logotype that was previously there. — trlkly 21:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2014
This edit request to Playboy has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
American pornographic magazine for men Dilovesyou (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
2. Please change the description: "pornographic magazine for men" to "men’s lifestyle platform" because Playboy Magazine is meant to be a lifestyle resource for men rather than pornographic magazine. The magazine is mostly composed of informative articles and up to date information regarding lifestyle and current events. Also the print magazine describes playboy as "entertainment for men".
4. You can confirm this on http://www.iplayboy.com/
Dilovesyou (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 20:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)