Talk:Play It Again, Brian/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 04:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.
"The episodes follows Peter and Lois, who are going through a tense time in their marriage..." this wasn't part of a two-part series or anything, so it should just be 'episode,' right?
Is there a promotional image we can use for the infobox?
There's a section in the infobox for guest actors, which I think should be included since there are so many, and their characters could be listed too.
Plot section: It would help if you put the voice actors in parenthesis after the characters they perform.
"Peter immediately begins enjoying himself, as being very annoying." -- I don't understand this, either.
"...and since then he has been criticized for the style of humor that he brings to the show." -- Are you talking about Herbert or Mike Henry?
It might also help to include a little on the deleted scenes you mention in the DVD release.
Cultural References: Isn't the Cleveland/Black Box scene parodying a music video? If so it should be mentioned.
Checklink tool is showing minor issues with several links, see if you can fix them.
Dablink tool returns no problems with disambiguation pages.

I am placing the article on hold pending the above improvements. —Ed!^(talk) 04:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article 10 days ago, and pinged the editor seven days ago. Having seen no response in terms of either edits or a response, I must fail the article for GA. It will need to be renominated once it meets the criteria. —Ed!^(talk) 13:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]