Talk:PlayStation 2/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: found and fixed one.[1]. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   This article contains a large number of citation needed tags, some dating back over 3 years. I am quick-failing it on that alone.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Quick fail on WP:GACR #2. Please make sure that articles measure up against the criteria before nominating. If you need help with that, try the releavnt project or a WP:Peer review. Fail GA nomination. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)