Talk:Plans (album)

What about Directions? -LK

I put in a short mention of it :) Snoopydance 01:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen ^Talk 23:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes Bonus Track

There is an additional track available when purchasing the entire album from iTunes. The track is titled Start Again (iTunes Version) [Bonus Track] and is 2 minutes, 38 seconds long. I did not know if it belongs in the article or not, so I will let someone else decide. :) MrHen. 15:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indie

How is Transatlanticism an "indie" record? The album was released by Atlantic... You can't get much more non-indie than that...

Alstan Faber 12:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite mistaken. Plans was in fact the first album the band released under the Atlantic label; Transatlanticism was the last they released for Barsuk, the Washington-based indie label. So... in conclusion, maybe knowing more abut the band before talking would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.197.83 (talk) 23:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose what he meant was "How is Plans indie when it was released to Atlantic?" 64.55.111.18 (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Plans.jpg

Image:Plans.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FUR added. Done and done. Should we remove this bot message from the talk page now? I don't know how these things work. LinkTiger (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Plans (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427110050/http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_death_cab_cutie_2/index.html to http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_death_cab_cutie_2/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]