Talk:Plan 111

Untitled

I don't know why my edit would look like an Ad. I just cited the original reports. The entry just explained what this plan is.

What's more is this entry just looks like a trimmed translated version of its Chinese language page. That page looks fine, nobody said it's like an Ad.

I just deleted a sentence that may look like Ad.

Hello User:Flyboyleo. I put the tags on your article. The reason that I feel that it is written like an ad is:

The promotive wording, such as first-class minds from around the world, top universities and the repeated use of the word talent in the sense of individual. According to whom is this expertise? Who can credibly say that the people involved are "talents"? See more at WP:Peacock.
The large amount of detail. Is the recruitment procedure really relevant to an encyclopedic article? Does academic readers need to know that [e]ach academic master should work at least a month within China [...]? See more at WP:Detail, and consider loose-reading WP:Not too.
The list at the bottom of the article is not only in excessive detail, but also fails to conform to Wikipedia's style standards. Please read some other list-filled articles, for instance Ivy League, and consider having a look at WP:MOS for complete instructions.

Other than that, please don't remove maintanence tags only because you disagree with them. Focus on improving the article with the criticism in mind, and all else should follow.

And one more thing: when commenting on talk pages such as this one, make sure to add "~~~~" at the end of your comments, so that everyone will know it is you who is speaking. See more at Help:Talk pages and WP:Sign.

Hope you don't take any of this personal. We are all just trying to build an encyclopedia here! :) Gaioa (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]