Talk:Plain meaning rule
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Examples needed
[edit]This articles needs some simple concrete examples of application of the plain meaning rule. Even OR made up examples are better than nothing, but best is a few cases where the judge explicitly used the rule in a ruling. PPdd (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Puffenstuff vs. Pufendorf
[edit]In this quote: "The common sense of man approves the judgment mentioned by Puffenstuff (sic. Puffendorf), that the Bolognian law which enacted ‘that whoever drew blood in the streets should be punished with the utmost severity’...", both the case being cited and the older case being indirectly quoted obviously refer to the words of Samuel von Pufendorf; I'm not sure where "Puffenstuff" came from in this context. This passage appears on several pages; I've left in the '[sic]' but changed "Puffenstuff" to "Pufendorf" and corrected the link to refer to the political philosopher rather than to the children's television series. - Liber loquax (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Plain meaning rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20051214130028/http://legaltheorylexicon.blogspot.com:80/2004_04_01_legaltheorylexicon_archive.html to http://legaltheorylexicon.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_legaltheorylexicon_archive.html#108169832522315548
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Purposive approach?
[edit]I just came here to read about the different statutory interpretation methods employed by judges and was wondering why the purposive approach is not represented here?
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Purposive_approach — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wtf4photography (talk • contribs) 17:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)