Talk:Plain maskray

Plain maskray has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 17, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Plain maskray is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Plain maskray/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 17:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see your articles back at GAC. I'll take a look through. J Milburn (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"with the occasional penaeid prawn and amphipod." Shouldn't that be "or"?

Changed.

"This species is parasitized by a tapeworm in the genus Acanthobothrium.[7]" Do we know the species, or not?

Found it.

Sources are fine, images are fine (I tweaked the license and confirmed the source). No problems with stability, and it seems no sources have been ignored. Note that I made a few small edits to the article. I'm happy to promote once the two tiny issues above are seen. J Milburn (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen to the suggested issues. -- Yzx (talk) 19:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great- I'm happy to promote. I think this may well be the shortest GA review I've ever conducted. Great work! J Milburn (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]