Talk:Plagianthus regius

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

additions

added lots of info with references. plus some pictures.

not sure if its supposed to be Plagianthus regius subsp. regius because of the Chatham Island version.

See Plagianthus regius (Poit.) Hochr. subsp. regius http://www.mwpress.co.nz/store/downloads/Poole%20and%20Adams%20Update.pdf

--Grapeman4 (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Individual pages for subspecies?

Do Plagianthus regius subsp. regius and Plagianthus regius subsp. chathamicus need individual articles? Or should all the information just be included on the P. regius species page?

There are differences between the subspecies (like heteroblastic/divaricating juvenile form, abundance/distribution, conservation status, synonyms, etc.) that might make individual pages helpful, but I believe Wikipedia doesn't deem things like subspecies to be notable enough for individual pages. Ceveg (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]