Talk:Pisa-class cruiser/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 15:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- A couple of extra brackets in the armament line in the infobox
- Good catch.
- It seems odd to discuss Averof first, when she was the last ship of the three built
- It seemed to flow easiest right after mentioning her, kinda like an ABBA-structure poem. I'm not wedded to it though and I can restructure it if you think that it would read better.
- Fair enough. It just struck me as a little odd - the editor who did the B-class assessment at WP:MHAR commented on it too (don't know if you saw that).
- It seemed to flow easiest right after mentioning her, kinda like an ABBA-structure poem. I'm not wedded to it though and I can restructure it if you think that it would read better.
- One dupe link for amidships - though I also wouldn't duplicate the links for Averof's builder/location in the table.
- Good idea.
- I'd split the characteristics section into sub-headers
- I've kinda gotten away from that given that only the armament section is usually more than a single paragraph, but done.
- Link to BL 9.2 inch gun Mk IX–X?
- I decided against it because I'm not sure how much commonality there actually was between the export pattern and the British service pattern. Obviously they used the same shell, but the significantly higher muzzle velocity for the Greek gun was the deciding factor in not linking them.
- Ok - I just wondered because there is a section in that article on the type used on the ship.
- I decided against it because I'm not sure how much commonality there actually was between the export pattern and the British service pattern. Obviously they used the same shell, but the significantly higher muzzle velocity for the Greek gun was the deciding factor in not linking them.
- A couple of extra brackets in the armament line in the infobox
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Brassey'sPisaClass.jpg - needs a UK PD tag or else moved to en.wiki
- Done.
- File:Brassey'sPisaClass.jpg - needs a UK PD tag or else moved to en.wiki
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)