Talk:Pippinids

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title change

This entry is called "Pippinids" but it talks about "Pippinids and Arnulfings" which are also listed in the box on the right. Therefore this article should be called "Pippinids and Arnulfings" or be split into "Pippinids" and "Arnulfings".

ICE77 (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Str1977 ^(talk) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although some scholars make a distinction, not all do. A perusal of the literature shows clearly that "Pippinids" is often used for Pippin II and his descendants. I don't think splitting the article makes sense. It will lead to too much confusion. Better to deal with the terminology in one place. Srnec (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should the name be changed to Pepinids seeing as Pippen is the German version of the Frankish name Pepin. Netanyahuserious (talk) 03:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, both Pippin and Pepin are valid. In any case, the Frankish language was Germanic and closer to German than French. Wikipedia should be consistent within articles but not enforce consistency across articles, as per the usual way of handling legitimate spelling variants. Srnec (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]