Talk:Pinzón brothers

A fact from Pinzón brothers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Pinzón brothers (statue pictured) played so crucial a role in Christopher Columbus's first expedition that some historians credit them as "co-discoverers" of America?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/January.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Hey, this is my first wikipedia article post. It was originally one of my 9th grade World History reports, just edited a bit. There are probably some mistakes with wiki-format and grammer, so if you see any edit them. Shoe1127 23:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

His names aren't Pinzon: his names hare Martin Alonso Eanes and Vicente Eanes. Pinzones was a nick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.34.60.116 (talk • contribs)

The commentary before this is untrue, inaccurate, malicious and unfounded. In addition, there is no literature 12 which credited. Miguel Angel fotografo. 88.12.170.122 (talk) 13:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have found no information to suggest this error. All my research has pointed to the validity of the name. Please send me some links to your info so i can make my article more accurate if need be. Shoe1127 03:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What a bad article! The section about the glory resembles more a discussion page. This needs cleaning.

Wow. This article is really poor, no offense to the high school student who wrote it. This is what gives Wikipedia its bad rap. Exactly how do these two brothers -- being notable explorers and governors, yes -- rank "among the world's most significant people?" And how is their influence "still felt today" exactly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.86.142.42 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

Adding tone tag to this article. The article has unsubstantiated information and needs a lot of attention and extra work. The tone is a little too laudatory. --Polylerus (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. A high school report is not a good way to start an encylopedia article. Also, the cited sources are all popularizing sources, roughly what you'd expect a teenager interested in history to use, not what any scholar would use.

The linked article in es-wiki actually looks quite good; I'd propose to throw this out & start over by translating that. I'll leave at least a few days for anyone to raise objections, though. - Jmabel | Talk 05:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking comments after nearly 5 days, I am going for it. - Jmabel | Talk 02:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Translation basically complete, although there may be a bit of cleanup to do on the translation of 500-year-old texts, which were a bit challenging. User:Ecemaml is looking them over to see if he finds anywhere I went wrong. Also, there was a bit more bibliographical information in es-wiki, which I'll bring over soon. - Jmabel | Talk 08:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, Jmabel. This article is greatly improved through your efforts. --Polylerus (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

While copyediting the article, I found a few places where I have queries about the text:

"(generally considered to constitute the discovery of the Americas by Europeans)" - don't know about the "generally considered", but the Vikings were Europeans and did get to the Americas.
What is the Spanish text doing at the beginning of one of the notes to the lead ("Dentro del...")?
"generally credited with the discovery of Brazil" - this contradicts the lead of History of Brazil
"the father would have two illegitimate children" - this should be "would have" if the children were born after Martin returned, but "had" if they were born before; not sure which is correct.
"Garcí Fernández" - not García?

Ucucha 07:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the third, there is Alternative theory of the European discovery of Brazil. I have no expertise or opinion on this.radek (talk) 07:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neither do I, but it does seem from that article that "generally considered" is too strong, as there are even two earlier claims. Ucucha 07:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discoverer of Brazil was Vicente Yáñez Pinzon, is a fact that since most of the scientific community recognizes, reached the mouth of the Amazon river months before Cabral. MiguelAngel fotografo (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC) PD. translate by Google.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pinzón brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://es.geocities.com/julioil/vypcap.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Pinzón brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]