Talk:Pilgrims Progress (album)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pilgrims Progress (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Pilgrim's or Pilgrims?
[edit]There seems to be some confusion as to whether the album's title includes an apostrophe or not. Even on the band's own website it is referred to as both Pilgrim's Progress and Pilgrims Progress. However, the album's artwork clearly identifies it as the latter. In addition, several online retailers including HMV, Recordstore.co.uk, and Amazon are listing the album under the title Pilgrims Progress—without an apostrophe. As such, I propose moving this article to Pilgrims Progress (album) and making Pilgrim's Progress (album) a redirect page. Anyone got any thoughts on this? --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Since no one objected, I performed this move on 26 Spetember 2010. Rather than redirect to Pilgrims Progress, I decided it was probably best to leave that namespace as a redirect to the more famous book. Let's face it, more people are gonna type in "Pilgrims Progress" looking for John Bunyan's book than they are looking for Kula Shaker's fourth album. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 18:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)