Jump to content

Talk:Pier Gerlofs Donia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Not well-written: weak prose.
2. Factually accurate?: Not even close: no references, no footnotes, lots of original research.
3. Broad in coverage?: Doesn't look like it.
4. Neutral point of view?: No. Article uses an obviously biased tone.
5. Article stability? Yes.
6. Images?: OK.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. —Anas talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Anas talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]