Talk:Pictures for Sad Children/Archives/2016/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Pictures for Sad Children. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Most Related Online Properties Are Down
The website picturesforsadchildren.com, the tumblr account, and sadpicturesforchildren.com are all down. The LiveJournal account hasn't been updated since 2010 and has "goodbye, foom" for the title. Author John Campbell's twitter (https://twitter.com/itsjohncampbell) is still active, but while he seems to be aware of the problem, it's hard to make any sense out of most of the tweets, he's still linking to his empty tumblr on a regular basis, and I don't see any updates about what's planned for the website. What do we do in a case like this? LaesaMajestas (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- He's posting white or 'blank' images to his tumblr, but all the old posts appear to be there. I can only assume this is related to his recent post about work having no value: http://boohooboo.tumblr.com/post/75797422291 Or maybe it's unrelated. But I think this is deliberate, and not a withdrawal from the public eye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.46.69 (talk) 06:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Pictures for Sad Children has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This webcomic no longer exists except in archives and physical forms. It is not a webcomic anymore.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kajong0007 (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Cleopatra isn't a queen any more; just because something no longer exists doesn't mean it ceases being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himynameishelen (talk • contribs) 17:09, February 27, 2014 (UTC)
- That's literally the most absurd example of pedantry I've seen on this god forsaken hellhole. No, just no. Omgtotallyradical (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)