Talk:Phytosaur

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Phytosaur is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Chatterjee (2001) petitioned the ICZN to designate a complete phytosaur skeleton excavated from India as the neotype of Parasuchus hislopi. In 2003, the ICZN agreed with this case, and Parasuchus was redefined to have a neotype. Thus, the original type specimen, a fragmentary jaw, is the primary type specimen.

Chatterjee, S. 2001. Parasuchus hislopi, 1885 (Reptilia, Archosauria): proposed replacement of the lectotype by a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 58(1): 34-36.

Phytosaurs in North America

The article lists the places that Phytosaurs are found, and it says: ".... North America, (namely Alberta)...". Let me point out that Phytosaurs are abundantly found in the southern United States, mainly Arizona and New Mexico. Don't doubt me on that, because I've dug them up. I'm not even sure that they were found in Alberta. Can someone confirm that they really were found in Alberta? Paleo Kid (talk) 03:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any mention of Albertan phytosaurs online. I'd remove it. Abyssal (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported claims

I don't have time to go through and fix all of this right now, but I've noticed that this article contains a lot of claims not actually supported by the papers they cite, such as the claim that they did not use "death rolls" in hunting (which, though not an unreasonable claim, is not discussed at all in the sources cited) and the claim that Mystriosuchus may have been viviparous, which is in no way supported by the sources and would probably be WP:SYN at best even if the sources did contain the cited claims. There might be other such claims in the article; I haven't checked everything. At least some of these claims were added by a particular now-banned user known for inserting OR and SYN into paleontology articles. Would it be best to just remove any such claim, or add warnings of some kind to the article until it can be rewritten, or what? Ornithopsis (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would just remove them, though be warned you'll likely face reversion by said banned user under some new IP. Lusotitan (Talk | Contributions) 07:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paleo-biology section?

Should there be a section about the fauna and flora that were around during Phytosaur abundance?104.169.31.99 (talk) 06:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]