Talk:Physical plant

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advice or feedback

If anyone is reading this and could give me some feedback that would be very helpful. I'm looking forward to working with anyone else on this page. --Johnnyhopkins214 (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Johnnyhopkins214, I would like to work on this article with you. Risk Engineer (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

word origin

What is the origin of using the word PLANT in this sense?-96.233.20.129 (talk) 23:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marking the article for cleanup

When reading the article, the layout seems a bit strange. For instance, the section on power plants contains only a subsection on nuclear power; maybe it could be expanded with information about coal or hydroelectric plants? And wouldn't broadcast engineering fall under telecommunications, as a form of communication over distances?

Additionally, there were a lot of grammatical and typographical errors present, which could probably be easily copyedited out.

Finally, I feel like a lot of content is overlapping with those from other pages. For example, the sections on nuclear power and desalination plants all have a respective main article which would probably contain aspects of plant design.

I'm kinda new to Wikipedia editing though, if anyone disagrees with the tag, let me know. I'm also happy to help expand/reorganize the article as needed. Pg 4919 (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]