Talk:Physical Review

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Physics: Publications Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.

Comment

I hesitated to create a trivia section (a dubious practice at best) for the single item about Tom Lehrer's show "The Physical Revue".
And still more sadly, reviewing the first 100 of "about 600" Google hits on

"Physical Review" Playboy

offered no instances of them in the same sentence. I had hoped for evidence that the clever bit about "reading physical review" meaning looking at the "pictorial" articles in Playboy was more than a passing amusement between two grad students, or within one department. Anyone?
--Jerzy•t 15:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Physical Review X is a sad joke. Nothing but an expensive vanity press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.131.203 (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]