Talk:Photonic integrated circuit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Photonic integrated circuit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article still requires serious work.

I've removed numerous sources that are in non-English languages and that are simply not relevant. Statistics on this page also lack any type of source, and I can't find any sources to correct or back up anything here. Article likely requires an electrical expert. DeliriousWolf (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I have reworded and expanded on this article. I believe it is considerably less technical than it was before. I have also noted the importance of photonic circuits, categorized the article, and provided some "see also" links. I'm working now to add my resources.

This article needs work

This article need some serious work. There are may statements which vague or would not be generally held to be true. While it needs not to be overly technical the simplification must not create inaccuracy. Since it is currently being edited I get to it later and clean it up. Dtneilson 02:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Current status" section is written in marketese

Even though formally "Current status" has all the references and stuff, it's heavily infested with marketing wording about how novel, superior and challenge-addressing all of it is, and that's definitely not up to encyclopedia standarts. Nuke it? 5.77.200.38 (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]