Talk:Photo Hunt

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Minecraft@Home (5 participants)
SuperBot Entertainment (1 participant)
Ryo Sakazaki (2 participants)
Super Mario War (3 participants)
David Pierce (CEO) (3 participants)
Build order (3 participants)
Star Wars: The Old Republic: Fatal Alliance (4 participants)
Covet Fashion (6 participants; relisted)
Vector TDx (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Donkey Kong (start)
Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) (start)
Tina Armstrong (start)
Birdo (nom)
Shin Megami Tensei V (nom)
Justin Yu (nom)
Kim Kitsuragi (start)
Miner 2049er (start)
Pokémon Sword and Shield (nom)
Pixel Piracy (start)
Ether One (start)
Yoshi's New Island (nom)
Dr Disrespect (start)
Pokémon Sword and Shield Expansion Pass (start)
Async Corp. (start)
The King of Fighters '99 (nom)
Hotline Miami (start)
Fan-made Pokémon games (start)
Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures (start)
The Outer Worlds (start)
Iron Soldier 2 (start)
River Raid (start)
The Great Giana Sisters (start)
Pikachu (start)

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

File:Photo_Hunt_screen_shot.jpg may be deleted

I have tagged File:Photo_Hunt_screen_shot.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 07:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion????

Proposing this article for deletion is aboslutely ridiculous! There's no sensible reson for deletion. The article is in no way spam or vandalism and should remain on wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.127.95 (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]