This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
removed lots of commercial puffery (about this object on the secondary market which has sold at auction). way too much legendary and historic (etc) for an old TV prop. i was copyediting anyway but then discovered that much of the text was lifted straight from the buyer's personal website --both a copyright problem and a resale/donation value Conflict Of Interest. the talk page about the buyer already mentions many worries about COI. Cramyourspam (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article on “Howdy Doody” says that Smith had a second Photo Doody made, which was the one (it says) that he was using up until his death in 1998 - shouldn’t that be covered here? The article treats the subject as if there was only ever one. Also, would it not be better to roll this article into the main “Howdy Doody” article, with a section on the three original puppets, and the subsequent replicas which Smith commissioned, the yeas for which they served, etc.? I’m a complete ignoramus on this subject, and only found this because of a reference to “Photo Doody” in an article about Andy Kaufman, and it would be more useful in an article which covered all aspects of the show (which may be a cultural icon in the U.S. but doesn’t seem to have traveled any further). Jock123 (talk) 21:51, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
