Talk:Phosphatidylinositol phosphate

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Chemicals

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this disambiguation page or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles

Categorisation

I've reverted the re-addition of parent categories since, as described at the bottom of the paragraph at WP:CAT#How to categorize an article, it's usually best to categorise articles in the most specific category available, which in this case is Category:Phospholipids.

If you have a look at Category:Chemistry, for example, you'll notice there are no other articles on specific chemicals at that level: this is because the category would be too enormous to browse if all the chemical were listed that high up. Hence sub-categories are used instead. Thanks, Clicketyclack 20:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term phospholipid is too narrow. Additional categories included so that readers may relate it to its context. Showjumpersam 21:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted: how does adding parent categories, which as I pointed out contain no other articles on individual chemicals, help readers "relate it to its context"? Don't you think that context might be made clearer in the article, perhaps by growing its content beyond one line? Clicketyclack 08:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]