Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Trials and Tribulations

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Trials and Tribulations has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 8, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Requested move

A move request discussion involving this page is currently taking place here. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney: Justice for All which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Judgesurreal777 (talk · contribs) 21:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am claiming his article for review against the Good Article criteria. Review will be up when it is ready! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the extended wait, I will be reviewing this soon, and it will be excellent! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, what's going on with this? I understand if real-life things prevent you from spending much time on WP, but it's been a month. Do you want to hand this review over to another editor (and review another of my GANs/FACs later when you have more time), or are you able to do the review soon?--IDV^talk 15:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgesurreal777: (pinging to make sure you see the message)--IDV^talk 15:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IDV: I apologize, but life has intervened. I promise I will review one of your articles, perhaps it is best that I do one later and not this one. Thanks you for understanding!!! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgesurreal777: All right, cool. I'll request a new reviewer for this one, then.--IDV^talk 16:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk · contribs) 16:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Prose: everything is very organized, reviewers are mentioned by name, and information from multiple sources is combined pleasingly. Under the Plot subsection, I think it's important to note that Iris and Dahlia are twin sisters. I'm not sure when in the game this is revealed, but it makes it more believable that Dahlia could impersonate her. The last chapter's plot is very convoluted. I'm not sure if there is a better way to explain it though.
Reference layout: the review cites well-known video game sites. It does cite some personal blogs for the developers for information on development, which is appropriate. I checked every citation except the ones from the instruction booklet (but I have played the game, so I know the information has good face validity). They're nicely done, with links to archival pages when appropriate. I know some Japanese, but I still used google translate to check the Japanese Famitsu reviews. Under the Reception subsection, I couldn't find the "memorable and hilariously animated" quote in its citation.
Pictures: uses one fair use image at low resolution appropriately.

Closing comments = Very well-done page! I'm putting it on hold for those two minor things I mentioned, Iris and Dahlia being twins and the "memorable and hilariously animated" quote. I won't be on Wikipedia August 10-15th, so if I am unresponsive then, just know that I will be back.— Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rachel Helps (BYU): Thank you for the review! I added the bit about Iris being Dahlia's twin sister - you're totally right, that last episode is convoluted, and something like this helps make things at least slightly clearer. Regarding "memorable and hilariously animated": the quote is on page 2 of the review, but I can see it being difficult to find unless you know there's a second page, so I added "pp. 1–2." to the citation.--IDV^talk 15:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks great! Passing this as GA. Congrats @IDV:!Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]