Talk:Phir Hera Pheri

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

???

Is this movie real? It was supposed to be on video in december.--Aeom Mai 22:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's real and its one of the best movies I've ever seen!!

RIP OFF

this films plot is identical to lock stock and two smoking barrels (british film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.160.17 (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too many similarities to be original.

Yes indeed its too much of a coincidence for the plot to be original. Or if in doubt, compare the plot analysis with Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and make your own informed decision yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao (talk • contribs) 02:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK - there is a source so I wrote that it is a remake. Shahid • ^Talk2me 07:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be titled as a remake though? It is a direct rip-off and should be noted as plagiarised. A remake is sanctioned by the studio that put the original movie out in the first place. Calling it a remake is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.203.99 (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

_____________> i noted the similarities the main page but somebody deleted it...!!!!!!!!!!!! something going on here.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay.yours (talk • contribs) 11:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]