Talk:Philosophy of geography

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 August 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

What is Phi of Geo?

Please add lots. SCmurky 23:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the philosophy of geography? I don't see it appear in the backbone you set up for the article. The example of feminism: the issue is geographically here and it is geographically there, but that does not make it the philosophy of geography. Before writing lots of details about feminism here, try to write an introduction first: what is, in the most basic terms, the philosophy of geography? ActiveSelective 15:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been searching for resources by searching the Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish wikipedia's and have looked in their pages Philosophy, Geography, Philosophy of Science, and their Portals, but none of them had anything on Phi of Geo. The only info of interest I found was:

The Ancient Greeks seem to have considered Geography as being a Philosophy.
There is something to say for a Geography of Philosophy (Eastern Philosophy, Western Philosophy, Precolumbian Philosophy) but should it be included here?
Google search for Phi of Geo showed that there are courses on methodology in Geo, but sadly not much more. The courses seem to comprise of general Philosophy of Science (Kant, Popper, Kuhn, etc) lectures located at Faculties of Geography.

Good luck! ActiveSelective 20:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC) (once a student of Phi)[reply]

...and I rearranged the backbone and added some. ActiveSelective 20:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should the classical Greek philosophers' opinions of geography be at all included here? i.e: It was thought that climate played a part in temperament.

I'm currently doing a class in the philosophy of geography, and some important thinkers in the field are Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze and Judith Butler. I don't have the time or the expertise to write an article, but trust me it is a real discipline! Tresdessert (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy of Geography or Phi in Geography - Geography draws upon many branches of philosophy, the same way other social studies do - it doesn't have any distinct Philosophy of its own, as such. I plan to give this article a good seeing-to at somepoint soon... If I get the time... --Cooper-42 12:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first reference link does not work. Jiayong.liang (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Layout???

The layout of the article does not fit the topic.

The article ought to start with an ontological debate about 'What is Geography?' in this case the issue that geography has no unified definition and the issue as to whether geography is a Science, Social Science or a Humanity ought to be addressed.
Methodology of geography should contain the various methodologies (obviously) such as the scientific method (including cause and effect - deduction, induction and abduction) and critical geographies methods (feminist, humanist, radical etc) of analysis and not really quantitative and qualitative. Easiest way would be to split this into phys geog methos and human geog methods.
Geographical perspectives - at the moment is irrelevant as it does not makes sense as ecological is a subset of spatial?!
Role of geography should be changed into whether geography should be policy relvant or whether it should be purely educational. (At present it has philosophy in there for no apparent reason) Also the use of meta theories or multiple theories and models, focus on process or form and reality or representation could be disscussed as well as the issue of whether geographers should focus on generalisties or on the uniquness of the local.
Environmental Determinism ought not be given shuch prominance there are many other philosophies to be written about such as critical realism, logical positivism, critical rationalism, pragmatic realism, causality, application of chaos and complexity, systems theory, geosophy, Non-representational theory, Post-Colonial theories, marxism, post-marxism, neo-malthusianism, Lefebvre, political ecology (already on the geography page and has it's own article) to name but a few.

The article has a lot of work to be done, hopefully you will help and my time is limited, but it is achievable. I shall go and do some reading to get more information and hopefully be able to help after the geography article itself has been sorted. AlexD 12:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shake up

I've pruned the article back to a stub, and added a few relevant bits. the old version is here[1]. I've also requested attention from the relevant wikiprojects. Banno 10:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs major overhaul

The literature review in this page is lacking tremendously, it is limited to only the Western traditions, and only goes back to the 1930s. We need to bring in the Ptolemy traditions, Arab, Chinese, and British at the very least. Key books to mention are Geographia and Geographia Generalis. I'll begin working on this page, but thought I'd start the discussion. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 20:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]