Talk:Philippines national rugby union team

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines national rugby union team → Philippine National Rugby Union Team – The word "Philippines" can only be a noun, and it can't act as an adjective, thus, "Philippine" is used which is an adjective. (eg. Philippine National Police, Philippine National Red Cross, Philippine National Railways, etc) Thinkbeforeyoupost (talk) 04:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion or preference for "Phillipine" or "Phillipines" but the capital letters in "National Rugby Union Team" shouldn't be there. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on the capitalisation (as per Mattingbn) but note that other articles use the name of the country e.g. England national rugby union team not the adjective and so the article should stay where it is. The use of the country name is consistent with the naming policies used in other sports e.g. England national football team.GordyB (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So they do, I never really thought about that before. Previous moves have been justified citing Wikipedia:Naming conventions, which I assume is the WP:Noun part. AIRcorn (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The standard naming convention is to use the name of the nation rather than the demonym, therefore Philippines national rugby union team is the correct name. – Pee Jay 00:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. We do not used adjectives in the names of these teams. For example, we use the word Scotland for the Scotland national rugby union team. The word Scotland is not an adjective, it is a noun. The adjectives to use for Scotland would be Scottish or Scots. Therefore, the usage of the noun Philippines in this title is appropriate. --Bob247 (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Philippines national rugby union team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prfu.com/content/view/89/162/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prfu.com/content/view/93/162/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]