Talk:Philippine Navy HDP-2200 Future Offshore Patrol Vessel

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Tambayan Philippines

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

HDP-2200.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Original Analysis or Speculation in article

Girder2139

The additions to articles such as notes that constitute 'original' analysis or speculation by contributors is specifically prohibited in Wikipedia.

See reference entries: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girder2139 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes obviously. And it's also obvious that when editors "claim" that something is a speculation, they have to provide explanation and proof first before doing something such as unilaterally overriding an edit or delete it. That's basic logic of "you claim you prove". WaterMirror17 (talk) 08:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of extraneous details to infoboxes

On basic principle infoboxes should be 'concise', as per the reference entry: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:Infobox Adding extraneous information that is not justifiably inserted in the article body does not hold to his principle and clutters the infobox. The constant adding of "notes" to the infobox also breaks what is standard practice observed on other articles.

--Girder2139 (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, but what is "concise" is debatable at times in the first place, thus the need of explanation and proof before doing something such as unilaterally overriding an edit or delete it. That's one of basic logic of "if you claim, then you prove". WaterMirror17 (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]